Shashishekhar Gavai
Aurangabad, now officially renamed Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, is arguably the district with the most diverse historical monuments in the country, spanning a period of almost two millenia. It has two UNESCO World Heritage Sites – Ajanta Caves with their exquisite Buddhist era frescos dating back over 2000 years and the magnificent Kailasa Shiva temple in the Buddhist/Jain/Hindu Ellora caves complex. Kailasa was carved from a single rock by the Rashtrakuta kings in the 8th century CE.
Not far from Ellora is the impressive hill fort of Daulatabad. Originally known as Devagiri, it was built in the 12th century CE by Yadava kings. Subsequently conquered by the Delhi Sultanate a hundred years later, it became Daulatabad and changed hands several times over the centuries that followed. Between Ellora and Daulatabad lies Khuldabad , the final resting place of two historical figures. The first being Malik Ambar, a former Abyssinian slave who rose to become the Prime Minister and de facto ruler of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate. He also founded the city of Aurangabad at the beginning of the 17th century and lies buried in an impressive tomb. The second grave, and a far less imposing one, is that of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb who named the city, founded by Ambar, after himself.( One of Aurangzeb’s wives was ,however, bestowed the Bibi ka Makbara in Aurangabad, a mausoleum which is a rather modest version of the Taj Mahal)

While Malik Ambar lies undisturbed, it is the Mughal emperor who has been threatened with eviction by the admirers of the Maratha king Sambhaji Maharaj ( and others allegedly trying to extract political capital) who was most cruelly tortured and hacked to pieces on Aurangzeb’s orders.The ‘ Oust Aurangzeb’ campaign was apparently triggered by a biopic on the Maratha king with graphic visuals of his torture and dismemberment (those of us who are dismissive of Bollywood be warned). The threat to Aurangzeb’s bones was serious enough for the government to cordon off his tomb and provide round the clock security. But the campaign appears to have lost steam and the old emperor may be safe….for now ! Digging up graves with either a greedy or vengeful eye on the occupants has been an old vocation as history tells us. Tomb raiders are not just a Hollywood fantasy or a popular video game.

The pharaohs of ancient Egypt chose to be buried with a retinue of slaves, concubines and other worldly goods to serve them in the nether world. They surely expected trouble because elaborate measures were undertaken to ensure security. But after tens of centuries of peaceful non existence they hadn’t bargained for treasure hunters and meddlesome European explorers. While the former sought only valuables, the latter moved the bodies around and even conducted forensic examinations. Acts punishable for ‘lese majeste’ if Tutankhamun could have his way.
While burial and cremation were both practiced in Ancient Rome, emperors and members of the ruling class appear to have wisely preferred the latter. One can only speculate what votaries of the Roman Republic would have done to the grave of its destroyer Julius Caesar had he chosen to be buried. Rulers in ancient India, however, must have been free of any anxieties arising from fear of post – life disinterment. The practice of cremation sanctioned by religion should have addressed the issue effectively.


Some other despots may also have been apprehensive of posthumous despoliation.Genghis Khan who was responsible for the massacres of tens of thousands must have been quite justifiably concerned on this account. He died in 1227 CE and his burial in a secret location has been a source of great speculation. Legend has it that his military escort went to the extreme of slaughtering all who carried the body to the final resting place so that the grave would remain forever hidden. Our own Akbar, a descendent of Genghis Khan and great grandfather of Aurangzeb, may not have entertained such concerns. Following his death in 1605 CE he was laid to rest in a magnificent mausoleum in Sikandra near Agra built by his son Jahangir. But Akbar’s well deserved reputation as a benevolent emperor did not matter to the rebel Jats of the region who in 1688 CE plundered the tomb, desecrated his grave and burnt his remains.

Reza Shah Pahlavi, who had himself “elected” as the Shah of Iran in 1925 and established a dynasty, was forced to abdicate in 1941and died in exile 3 years later. His son and successor Mohammad Reza Pahlavi brought back his remains to Iran and had them buried in a mausoleum in 1950 in the town of Ray a suburb of Tehran. Then came the Islamic Revolution of 1979 when the son too was deposed and had to flee Iran. A rampaging mob destroyed Reza Shah Pahlavi’s mausoleum and dug up his grave only to find it empty.What happened to the body is something of a mystery. It was said that it had been moved out of the country at the start of the Islamic revolution. His daughter in law, the deposed Shah’s wife Farah Pahlavi, however, claimed later that it remained in Ray. She may be right and Reza Shah Pahlavi may have been disinterred and secretly re buried in the vicinity in anticipation of what was to follow. Indeed in 2018 a mummified corpse said to be that of the Shah was discovered in the neighbourhood.
Janos Kadar was the leader of communist Hungary when I was posted there in the early 80s. He died in 1989 and was buried in a cemetery in Budapest. His skull and some bones were stolen in 2007, apparently in protest against his role in the suppression of the 1956 uprising against communist rule.A couple of years later the body of former Cypriot President Papadopoulos was stolen from his grave in Nicosia. It was found 3 months later in another cemetery near the capital.

Not just monarchs and political leaders but celebrities too have been the victims of tomb raiders. The great comic actor Charlie Chaplin died in 1977 at the age of 88. He was buried in a cemetery in Switzerland. In what could well be a scenario straight out of one of his films, two thieves dug up his grave, stole the body, buried it in another spot and demanded ransom from the family to the order of 600,000 dollars. It took the police over 2 months to arrest the “kidnappers”. It took a while more to recover Charlie Chaplin because his abductors couldn’t find the spot they had hidden him. The Little Tramp may or may not have been amused – there’s no way to know !

Some others in history have commissioned the crime of body snatching not for retribution or personal gain but for medical studies. In the 17th,18th and 19th centuries medical practitioners and even hospitals in Britain and elsewhere in Europe hired body snatchers to dig up fresh graves for bodies to be used for dissection and medical lectures. Those corpses surely contributed to a greater understanding of the human anatomy and to advances in the field of surgery. In our own country theft of skeletons from graves is said to be a fairly lucrative business in some states. It is estimated that as many as 25000 are being illegally smuggled each year through neighbouring countries to medical institutions in western nations. A ghoulish business indeed and a case of Indian skeletons rattling in foreign cupboards!
Someone, somewhere once wondered why so many cemeteries were protected by high walls and strong gates when the guys within could not leave and those without didn’t wish to go in. Well , now you know!















































































